Automated Regression Testing

Our analysts have an attention-to-detail while performing automated regression testing.

What is the Difference Between Manual and Automated Testing?

Manual testing is completed by our employees as the name suggests. With automated testing, test cases may be executed or exploratory techniques used with the assistance of tools, scripts and software. Manual testing requires creativity, perseverance, pattern perception, and exploration.

Iterators performs manual testing with several different approaches, depending on your needs. We can execute test cases and are also proficient at structured exploratory testing techniques. Exploratory testing allows us to maximize the use of our creativity to delve into the areas perceived to have the greatest risk, or involve newly developed features.

Automated testing is well-suited for our employees with STEM backgrounds who can create well-structured programs to perform robust tests that continue to work as new features are added. We use such testing tools as Selenium, Appium, Applitools, and TestComplete. We can also use our skills with additional tools that you may have in-house.

We use the MoSCoW approach to automation in which we work together to identify what Must be, Should be, Could be and Will be automated. This results in overall savings for regression tests by automating the relevant parts and leaving specific areas for manual regression tests.

Each project will be designed around a customized approach based on your needs. For example, one of our approaches is to use the Page Object methodology for Selenium tests and integrate it with Applitools for performing sophisticated visual checks of websites. This can be used to verify that Chrome, Safari, Internet Explorer, Microsoft Edge, etc. are all providing consistent displays of your website. We will also run these tests in parallel using the cross-browser testing environment available with SmartBear.

Full Capabilities Statement

Client library congress
Client Loomis
Client anew
Client City Of Boston2
Client mit
Client johns hopkins
Client Vue Health
Client Boston College
Client Maxwell Leadership
Client ad club
Client make
Client Connelly


What People Are Saying

  • The QA assistance from Iterators LLC makes tracking features within the app easy to understand and fix through the manual tests they plan. They are available and adaptable when needed and are very knowledgeable with several software bug tracking software systems. Additionally, they provide a cost-effective way of developing a QA process. Their flexibility in assisting us whenever we required help, especially with our release scheduling, is impressive.

    Chris Paul, CTO, True Rowing/Hydrow

    Chris Paul, CTO, True Rowing/Hydrow

  • Following the successful completion of a Proof of Concept engagement for Boston College, we are looking forward to collaborating with the team at Iterators testing our Eagle Apps software. Additionally, we are working together on improving our internal testing processes and also looking at how automation of manual efforts can be significantly improved. Their team communicates very well with our team, and their ability to identify software bugs is outstanding."

    Denis Walsh, Director of Project Planning & Portfolio Governance

  • Thanks to an ongoing partnership with a small, local business, Iterators LLC, we have conducted the City’s first-known Voluntary Product Accessibility Template (VPAT). This point-in-time report uses four modes of accessibility (perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust) and 61 testable success criteria. These metrics verify online and digital accessibility efforts completed by the City to-date, and document future work that should be done.

    Jenethe Falvey, Chief Digital Officer, City of Boston

Unique People Unique Approach Quality Results

We Can Help You

Contact Us

Iterators LLC is Certified Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB) and Women’s Business Enterprise National Council WBENC-Certified WBE